Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Genetics and Intelligence

The protein domain issue is known as DUF1220. Humans have more than 270 copies of DUF1220 encoded in their DNA, far more than other species. The closer a species is to humans, the more copies of DUF1220 show up. Chimpanzees have the next highest number, 125. Gorillas have 99, marmosets 30 and mice just one.

Prof Sikela said: 'The one over-riding theme that we saw repeatedly was the more copies of DUF1220 in the genome, the bigger the brain. 'And this held true whether we looked at different species or within the human population.'

 

quoted from Dissecting Leftism August, 12, 2010

Friday, August 3, 2012

from dissecting leftism


10 Concepts Liberals Talk About Incessantly But Don't Understand

1) Being Open Minded: To a liberal, this has nothing at all to do with seriously considering other people's ideas. To the contrary, liberals define being "open-minded" as agreeing with them. What could be more close-minded than assuming that not only are you right, but that you don't even need to consider another viewpoint because anyone who disagrees must be evil?

2) Racism: Liberals start with the presumption that only white people who don't belong to the Democratic Party can be racist. So, for example, even if Jeremiah Wright can make it clear that he hates white people because of their skin color or if liberals take an explicitly racist political position, like suggesting that black people are too stupid and incompetent to get identification to vote, they can't be racist. White Republicans, on the other hand, are generally assumed to be racist by default, no matter how much evidence there is to the contrary.

3) Fairness: In all fairness, I must admit that fairness is an arbitrary concept. So, you could make the argument that no one could get "fairness" wrong. Still, liberals do because they don't make any effort to actually "be fair." As a practical matter, liberals define "fairness" as taking as much as possible from people who they don't think are going to vote for them and giving it to people who may vote for them in return for their ill gotten largesse. Certainly conservatives, libertarians, and moderates might disagree about how much money to take from the wealthy to redistribute to the poor or how to help the disadvantaged, but the only liberal answer to the question, "How much is enough?" is "more."

4) Greed: To a liberal, believing that you pay too much in taxes or even opposing paying more in taxes is greedy. In actuality, wanting to loot as much money as possible that someone else has earned to use for your own purposes, which is what liberals do, is a much better example of greed.

5) Hate: Liberals often define simple disagreement with them on issues like gay marriage, tax rates, or abortion as hatred. No matter how well a position is explained, or the logical underpinnings behind it, it's chalked up to hate. Meanwhile, the angriest, most vicious, most hateful people in all of politics are liberals railing against what they say is "hatred." This irony is completely lost on the Left.

6) Investment: Actual investments involve putting money or resources into a project in hopes that they will appreciate in value. Liberals skip the second half of that equation. To them, an "investment" is taking someone else's tax dollars and putting it into a project that liberals approve of and whether a profit is made or lost is so irrelevant that they typically don't even bother to measure the results.

7) Charity: Contributing your own money or time to a good cause is charity. Liberals view themselves as charitable if they take someone else's tax dollars and give it away to people they hope will vote for them in return. At a minimum, they should at least credit the taxpayers who paid for the money they gave away for the charity, although it's not really charity if it's involuntary. Of course, there's nothing charitable about asking someone else to sacrifice for your gain, which could actually be better described as selfish.

8) Patriotism: Liberals love America the way a wife beater loves his spouse. That's why they're always beating up the country "for its own good." Doesn't the country understand that liberals have to hit it in the mouth because they LOVE IT SO MUCH?!?!? Of course, the conventional definition of patriotism, which is loving your country and wishing it well, isn't one that liberals can wrap their heads around.

9) Tolerance: In a free, open, and pluralistic society, there are all sorts of behaviors that we may have to tolerate, even though we don't approve of those activities. Liberals don't get this distinction. For one thing, they don't understand the difference between tolerance and acceptance. They also don't extend any of the tolerance they're agitating for to people who disagree with them. Liberals silence people who disagree with them at every opportunity which is, dare we say it, an extremely intolerant way to behave.

10) Diversity: What liberals mean by "diversity" is that they want a broad range of people from different races, colors, and creeds who have identical political views. A black or Hispanic conservative doesn't contribute to "diversity" in liberal eyes because he actually has diverse views. Incredible role models for women like Sarah Palin can't be feminists to liberals because she doesn't share the same liberal beliefs as sexist pigs like Anthony Weiner and Bill Maher. How can you have any meaningful "diversity" when everyone has to think the same way

Saturday, June 25, 2011

O'Reilly Pinheads and Patriots

Just finished reading Bill O'Reilly's book Pinheads and Patriots. If you watch his TV show, a great deal of the content of the book repeats what he has said on TV.
Here comes the interesting part of my blog post.
I was talking to friend at a health club I belong to. I told him that I had just finished reading O'Reilly's book. He gave me a lecture about how O'Reilly controls the thoughts of millions of conservative Americans and is leading this country towards fascism. Where do people get these ideas? The guy is just a TV anchor. He has no political power. He has no intention of running for political office.
How can he possibly control the minds of people from the anchor of a TV show interrupted by commercials?

Thursday, May 13, 2010

some thoughts

I wish the blog administrator would make Thinker to Thinker work with ScribeFire Firefox add-0n.

I watch Dick Morris on TV. He is the most accurate political commentator because he is willing to change his opinion as circumstances change. Last night he said the republicans would take over both Houses of Congress. I wonder if he is correct. Time will tell.

I am having the worst seasonal allergy attach ever. My doctor has me on three steroids and some super strong antihistamine and I still have a post nasal drip the size of the Gulf oil spill.

It is even keeping me up at night. It is now 2:03 am cdt in the USA. Just can't sleep well when you keep waking up and coughing and sneezing.

This entry is more like a diary entry than anything else. Well you have to get back into the routine of making entries somewhere.

Why do all entries have to be brilliant essays?

Amazing my mind even works at 2:03 am. I can even type.

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Progressivism is a religion.

     Progressivism is a religion. It is based on faith. Faith that somehow if government is big enough, if it has enough programs and bureaucrats, it will achieve utopia here on earth. and that somehow it will be paid for, they don't know how, but I suspect they desire mana from heaven.
     Progressivism is faith based. It is not grounded in any reality. There isn't enough money to pay for the health care bill currently being debated plus all the other current federal spending. There isn't enough money to pay the deficit or the debt or the future commitments of about $107,000,000,000,000, so what are they doing?
     Like a religious fanatic who doesn't understand why the whole world doesn't voluntarily flock to his side, like a communist/socialist dictator who doesn't understand why no matter what he does he has to use secret police to force people to fit into the round holes he has made for their square peg way of thinking, American progressives understand they must use poitical trickery, tactics, and manuveuring to get their ways, that is why the health care bill is mired in closed door negotiations and outright bribes.

Friday, January 1, 2010

Why socialism always fails, another reason

Robert Mugabe, the lunatic dictator of Zimbabwe, saw large industrial farms owned by white people. First, he decided that it was wrong for white people to own huge farms. Second, he decided that the solution to the problem was to take the land from the people who know how to work it and give it to the poor black people that in his mind it was taken away from. So he did it. He took the land from white people and gave it to black people. Of course, because he is a politician, the program was full of graft and corruption. Cronies, relatives, sycophants, military officers, etc. got the land, along with some poor people.

None of them had any idea whatsoever how to run a large farm, and here we get to one of the most important false assumptions of socialism, that all people have equal skills. Socialists , for example, assume that a big problem poor people have is access to capital, access to education, access to all kinds of things like health care. So they come up with government programs that have no basis in reality. They believe you can just give a piece of farmland to anyone and the new owner will work the land productively. Of course, this isn't reality. Look at Zimbabwe.

They believe by having affirmative action, for example, that by making access to higher education easier for minorities it will solve the problem of minorities being under represented in colleges. And, yes, sometimes it works., but all too often it fails and we see the college dropout rate of minorities too high and the resultant destroyed lives from the shame and crushed self-esteem of failure.

When it had absolute power, the PRI socialist party of Mexico just appointed people to positions of power based on politics. A result was that Mexico, an oil rich country, had problems with oil production and gasoline refining due to all the incompetence and corruption of the government owned companies. I don't know if this is still true today.

But that is what socialist do. People are given positions of power or things like farmland and admission to a college based not on their ability but on the concept that you can just give someone something and they know what to do with it.

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

terrorism

Politicians think that fighting terrorism and white collar crimes are like fighting ordinary criminal activity. It isn't

Terrorists and white collar criminals are always looking for something new. Today's rules, regulations and laws always cover yesterday's crimes, that's why the latest terrorist made it onto the Northwest flight. He had a new type of bomb that he hid in a new way.

The financial collapse occurred because the mortgage derivatives were new things and the old rules and regulations didn't work for them.